diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index d73687b..01c0092 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -169,9 +169,9 @@ Additionally, unikernels are in direct “competition” with containers. By pro
| Technology | Pros | Cons |
| --- | --- | --- |
-| Virtual Machines | - Complete isolation from host
- Orchestration solutions available | - Requires compute power proportional to number of instances |
-| Linux Containers | - Lightweight virtualization
- Fast deployment times
- Ochestration solutions
- Dynamic resource allocation | - Reduced isolation between host and guest due to shared kernel |
-| Unikernels | - Lightweight images
- Specialized application | - Requires developing applications from the grounds up
- Limited deployment possibilities
- Lack of complete IDE support
- Static resource allocation
- Lack of orchestration tools |
+| Virtual Machines | - Complete isolation from host
- Orchestration solutions available | - Requires compute power proportional to number of instances
- Requires large infrastructures
- Each instance loads an entire operating system |
+| Linux Containers | - Lightweight virtualization
- Fast boot times
- Ochestration solutions
- Dynamic resource allocation | - Reduced isolation between host and guest due to shared kernel
- Less flexible (i.e.: dependent on host kernel)
- Network is less flexible |
+| Unikernels | - Lightweight images
- Specialized application
- Complete isolation from host
- Higher security against absent functionalities (e.g.: command line interface exploits) | - Requires developing applications from the grounds up
- Limited deployment possibilities
- Lack of complete IDE support
- Static resource allocation
- Lack of orchestration tools |
## State of the Art